Credit Hierarchy
Capital Markets & Regulation

The New Credit Hierarchy:
Who Gets Funded First

Why regulatory capital efficiency, not just credit risk, is deciding the fate of corporate borrowers in 2026.

SimplifyNumbers
STRATEGIC CREDIT REPORT • Q1 2026

The New Credit Hierarchy: Who Gets Funded First

Why regulatory capital efficiency, not just credit risk, is deciding the fate of corporate borrowers in 2026.

Executive Summary

The era of uniform credit availability is over. In 2026, the full implementation of Basel III Endgame standards has fundamentally altered the banking sector's incentives. We are witnessing a bifurcation in credit access: large, investment-grade corporates ("Tier 1") continue to access bank balance sheets at competitive rates, while small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and unrated borrowers ("Tier 3") are increasingly pushed toward private credit markets where costs are 300–500 basis points higher.

Our analysis indicates this is not a temporary liquidity crunch but a structural shift driven by Return on Risk-Weighted Assets (RoRWA). Banks are rationing credit based on capital efficiency rather than pure default risk. For CFOs and Treasurers, the implication is clear: access to bank capital is now a function of your "regulatory density" as much as your solvency.

Primary Driver
Capital Rationing
Banks prioritizing low-RWA assets over high-yield lending.
New Metric
RoRWA > 15%
The hurdle rate for retaining a balance sheet commitment.
Structural Shift
Private Credit Migration
SME lending permanently moving to non-bank lenders.

Core Strategic Insight

The "Capital Wall" has replaced the "Risk Curve." Historically, borrowers could access funds if they were willing to pay a higher price to compensate for higher risk. In the 2026 regulatory regime, price does not clear the market. If a loan's capital charge (RWA density) is too high, it dilutes the bank's return on equity to a point where no interest rate is sufficient to justify the use of scarce Tier 1 capital.

Diagnostic Analysis: The Mechanics of Rationing

The contraction in credit availability reported in the October 2025 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Surveys (SLOOS) in both the US and Euro area is not a cyclical anomaly; it is the mathematical outcome of the new regulatory architecture.

Exhibit 1 — The Credit Caste System
Structure
TIER 1: THE INSIDERS
Gov / Blue Chip / Inv. Grade
TIER 2: THE RATIONED
Secured SME / Mid-Market
TIER 3: THE EXCLUDED
Unsecured / High Risk / Brown Assets
THE CAPITAL WALL (Basel Output Floor)
Figure 1: The "Capital Wall" effectively blocks Tier 3 borrowers from bank balance sheets, forcing them into alternative markets. Unlike risk pricing, which is a slope, capital rationing is a cliff.

1. The Money Supply vs. Money Availability Paradox

While headline M2 money supply figures may suggest adequate systemic liquidity, this liquidity is trapped in the upper echelons of the credit hierarchy. Data from late 2025 indicates a sharp tightening of standards for C&I loans to small firms.

2. Renewal Bias: The Zombie Preference

A critical, often overlooked mechanism in this cycle is "renewal bias." Banks are incentivized to roll over loans to existing, potentially weaker clients ("zombies") rather than originate new loans to healthier but unproven borrowers. Why? Because originating a new loan requires a fresh capital assessment under the new, stricter Basel IV/Endgame standardized approaches.

3. The Green Asset Ratio Skew

The integration of climate risk into prudential frameworks has introduced a new rationing variable. A "brown" borrower (e.g., heavy manufacturing, transport) now carries a dual cost: a higher RWA density due to transition risk and a "reputational capital" charge.

Exhibit 2 — The RoRWA Optimization Matrix
Diagnostic
Capital Efficiency (RoRWA)
Strategic Value (Cross-Sell)
THE COMMODITY Low Value / High Eff
Transactional only. Kept for liquidity but pricing is tight.
THE CROWN JEWEL High Value / High Eff
Gets cheapest rates. Unlimited access. The bank's favorite client.
THE EXILES Low Value / Low Eff
Offboarded. "Please find another lender."
THE CASH COW High Value / Low Eff
Gets funding but pays high fees to subsidize capital usage.
Figure 2: Banks map clients on this grid. If you are in "The Exiles" quadrant (low cross-sell potential and high capital usage), your facility will not be renewed.

Strategic Implications

For Borrowers: The "Capital Efficient" Pivot

Borrowers must stop viewing themselves merely as credit risks and start viewing themselves as consumers of bank capital. CFOs must structure debt to be "capital efficient"—shifting away from long-dated, unsecured term loans toward shorter-duration trade finance.

Exhibit 3 — The Rationing Flowchart
Mechanism
Does the bank have excess capital above the G-SIB surcharge buffer?
↓ NO
Is the client "Essential" (High Cross-Sell / Deposits)?
↓ NO
Is the facility "Capital Efficient" (Short term / Secured)?
↓ NO
DECLINE RENEWAL / OFFBOARD

10-Step Roadmap: Climbing the Credit Ladder

Regional Lens

  • USA: The "Endgame" is aggressive. Regional banks, facing their own liquidity constraints, are retreating to local, secured lending.
  • UK: The PRA has maintained strict Basel adherence. "Brown" borrowers face double-impact from credit and climate screening.
  • Australia/NZ: Bank oligopolies provide stability but higher pricing power. Residential mortgages limit business lending capacity.
Sources & Citations:
• Federal Reserve Board (2025). "October 2025 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey."
• FDIC (2024). "White Paper on Basel III Endgame Proposal."
• Deloitte (2025). "2026 Banking and Capital Markets Outlook."